Site type

Location

100 m
Leaflet Tiles © Esri — Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, UPR-EGP, and the GIS User Community
Coordinates (degrees)
042.793° N, 120.388° W
Coordinates (DMS)
042° 47' 00" W, 120° 23' 00" N
Country (ISO 3166)
United States (US)

radiocarbon date Radiocarbon dates (56)

Lab ID Context Material Taxon Method Uncalibrated age Calibrated age References
Beta-171938 TEXTILE Twisted grass threads NA 10550±40 BP 12683–12481 cal BP Connelly et al. 2016 Table 1; Jenkins et al. 2013 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Jenkinset al.2004 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-191539 CHARCOAL Artemisia NA 7640±50 BP 8540–8372 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-213423 FECES Homo sapiens NA 10050±50 BP 11811–11340 cal BP Looseet al.2008 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-213424 FECES Homo sapiens NA 12400±60 BP 14870–14197 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-213426 FECES Homo sapiens NA 12290±60 BP 14801–14066 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-213427 FECES Homo sapiens NA 4130±40 BP 4822–4527 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005 Bird et al. 2022
OxA-16376 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10965±50 BP 13056–12760 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2008 Bird et al. 2022
OxA-16377 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 1308±28 BP 1290–1176 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
OxA-16497 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 12345±55 BP 14823–14106 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2011 Bird et al. 2022
OxA-16498 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 12275±55 BP 14791–14060 cal BP Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2012 Bird et al. 2022
OxA-38415 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 9663±29 BP 11190–10874 cal BP Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence… Bird et al. 2022
OxA-38445 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10407±37 BP 12582–12059 cal BP Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence… Bird et al. 2022
OxA-38674 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10262±57 BP 12453–11761 cal BP Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence… Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115892 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10505±25 BP 12616–12478 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115893 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10585±30 BP 12690–12496 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115894 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10750±30 BP 12749–12715 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115895 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10970±30 BP 12963–12766 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115896 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10540±30 BP 12673–12482 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115897 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10305±30 BP 12440–11936 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022
UCIAMS-115898 FECES Homo sapiens AMS 10965±30 BP 12924–12765 cal BP Jenkins et al. 2013 Bird et al. 2022

typological date Typological dates (0)

Classification Estimated age References

Bibliographic reference Bibliographic references

@misc{Connelly et al. 2016 Table 1; Jenkins et al. 2013 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Jenkinset al.2004,
  
}
@misc{Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005,
  
}
@misc{Looseet al.2008,
  
}
@misc{Jenkins et al. 2013,
  
}
@misc{Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2008,
  
}
@misc{Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2011,
  
}
@misc{Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2012,
  
}
@misc{Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence…,
  
}
@article{p3k14c,
  title = {P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates},
  author = {Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth, Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman, Jacob},
  year = {2022},
  month = {jan},
  journal = {Scientific Data},
  volume = {9},
  number = {1},
  pages = {27},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  issn = {2052-4463},
  doi = {10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7},
  abstract = {Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale, comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.},
  copyright = {2022 The Author(s)},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {Archaeology,Chemistry},
  month_numeric = {1}
}
{"bibtex_key":"Connelly et al. 2016 Table 1; Jenkins et al. 2013 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Jenkinset al.2004","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Looseet al.2008","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Jenkins et al. 2013","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2008","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2011","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2012","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence…","bibtex_type":"misc"}[{"bibtex_key":"p3k14c","bibtex_type":"article","title":"{P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates}","author":"{Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth, Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman, Jacob}","year":"{2022}","month":"{jan}","journal":"{Scientific Data}","volume":"{9}","number":"{1}","pages":"{27}","publisher":"{Nature Publishing Group}","issn":"{2052-4463}","doi":"{10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7}","abstract":"{Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale, comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.}","copyright":"{2022 The Author(s)}","langid":"{english}","keywords":"{Archaeology,Chemistry}","month_numeric":"{1}"}]
---
:bibtex_key: Connelly et al. 2016 Table 1; Jenkins et al. 2013 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007
  Jenkinset al.2004
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2007 Jenkins2005
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Looseet al.2008
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Jenkins et al. 2013
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2008
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2011
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Jenkinset al.2004 Jenkins2005 Jenkins2007 Looseet al.2012
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Blong et al. 2020- Younger Dryas and early Holocene subsistence…
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
- :bibtex_key: p3k14c
  :bibtex_type: :article
  :title: "{P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates}"
  :author: "{Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick
    and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson
    Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth,
    Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline
    and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman,
    Jacob}"
  :year: "{2022}"
  :month: "{jan}"
  :journal: "{Scientific Data}"
  :volume: "{9}"
  :number: "{1}"
  :pages: "{27}"
  :publisher: "{Nature Publishing Group}"
  :issn: "{2052-4463}"
  :doi: "{10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7}"
  :abstract: "{Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model
    prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent
    projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple
    regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative
    research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems
    across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different
    sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale,
    comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental
    data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database
    composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized
    sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological
    radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types
    of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct
    two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This
    database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian
    modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.}"
  :copyright: "{2022 The Author(s)}"
  :langid: "{english}"
  :keywords: "{Archaeology,Chemistry}"
  :month_numeric: "{1}"

Changelog