Site type

Location

Coordinates (degrees)
039.442° N, 114.902° W
Coordinates (DMS)
039° 26' 00" W, 114° 54' 00" N
Country (ISO 3166)
United States (US)

radiocarbon date Radiocarbon dates (18)

Lab ID Context Material Taxon Method Uncalibrated age Calibrated age References
Beta-163096 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 1580±60 BP 1586–1346 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-163097 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 3590±40 BP 4062–3728 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-163098 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 3510±40 BP 3885–3650 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-163099 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 1810±50 BP 1828–1586 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-163100 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 3460±40 BP 3835–3590 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
Beta-163101 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown NA 3690±40 BP 4148–3906 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11373 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3490±60 BP 3901–3579 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11374 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 1520±30 BP 1514–1314 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11375 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3630±40 BP 4083–3840 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11377 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 1610±40 BP 1549–1389 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11378 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 1680±50 BP 1701–1415 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11379 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3530±40 BP 3908–3693 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11380 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3480±50 BP 3880–3590 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11381 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3580±60 BP 4080–3698 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11382 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3480±40 BP 3865–3636 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11383 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3600±40 BP 4075–3732 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
NSRL-11384 NA FECES Organic Coprolite unknown AMS 3550±50 BP 3975–3695 cal BP Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022
UCR-3971 NA TEXTILE Lovelock wickerware fragment AMS 1650±40 BP 1689–1411 cal BP Unpublished date NSM 2001; Hattori 1982 Bird et al. 2022

typological date Typological dates (0)

Classification Estimated age References

Bibliographic reference Bibliographic references

  • No bibliographic information available. [Hattori 1982]
  • No bibliographic information available. [Unpublished date NSM 2001; Hattori 1982]
  • Bird, D., Miranda, L., Vander Linden, M., Robinson, E., Bocinsky, R. K., Nicholson, C., Capriles, J. M., Finley, J. B., Gayo, E. M., Gil, A., d’Alpoim Guedes, J., Hoggarth, J. A., Kay, A., Loftus, E., Lombardo, U., Mackie, M., Palmisano, A., Solheim, S., Kelly, R. L., & Freeman, J. (2022). P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates. Scientific Data, 9(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7 [p3k14c] 
@misc{Hattori 1982,
  
}
@misc{Unpublished date NSM 2001; Hattori 1982,
  
}
@article{p3k14c,
  title = {P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates},
  author = {Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth, Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman, Jacob},
  year = {2022},
  month = {jan},
  journal = {Scientific Data},
  volume = {9},
  number = {1},
  pages = {27},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  issn = {2052-4463},
  doi = {10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7},
  abstract = {Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale, comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.},
  copyright = {2022 The Author(s)},
  langid = {english},
  keywords = {Archaeology,Chemistry},
  month_numeric = {1}
}

{"bibtex_key":"Hattori 1982","bibtex_type":"misc"}{"bibtex_key":"Unpublished date NSM 2001; Hattori 1982","bibtex_type":"misc"}[{"bibtex_key":"p3k14c","bibtex_type":"article","title":"{P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates}","author":"{Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth, Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman, Jacob}","year":"{2022}","month":"{jan}","journal":"{Scientific Data}","volume":"{9}","number":"{1}","pages":"{27}","publisher":"{Nature Publishing Group}","issn":"{2052-4463}","doi":"{10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7}","abstract":"{Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale, comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.}","copyright":"{2022 The Author(s)}","langid":"{english}","keywords":"{Archaeology,Chemistry}","month_numeric":"{1}"}]
---
:bibtex_key: Hattori 1982
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
:bibtex_key: Unpublished date NSM 2001; Hattori 1982
:bibtex_type: :misc
---
- :bibtex_key: p3k14c
  :bibtex_type: :article
  :title: "{P3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates}"
  :author: "{Bird, Darcy and Miranda, Lux and Vander Linden, Marc and Robinson, Erick
    and Bocinsky, R. Kyle and Nicholson, Chris and Capriles, José M. and Finley, Judson
    Byrd and Gayo, Eugenia M. and Gil, Adolfo and d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade and Hoggarth,
    Julie A. and Kay, Andrea and Loftus, Emma and Lombardo, Umberto and Mackie, Madeline
    and Palmisano, Alessio and Solheim, Steinar and Kelly, Robert L. and Freeman,
    Jacob}"
  :year: "{2022}"
  :month: "{jan}"
  :journal: "{Scientific Data}"
  :volume: "{9}"
  :number: "{1}"
  :pages: "{27}"
  :publisher: "{Nature Publishing Group}"
  :issn: "{2052-4463}"
  :doi: "{10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7}"
  :abstract: "{Archaeologists increasingly use large radiocarbon databases to model
    prehistoric human demography (also termed paleo-demography). Numerous independent
    projects, funded over the past decade, have assembled such databases from multiple
    regions of the world. These data provide unprecedented potential for comparative
    research on human population ecology and the evolution of social-ecological systems
    across the Earth. However, these databases have been developed using different
    sample selection criteria, which has resulted in interoperability issues for global-scale,
    comparative paleo-demographic research and integration with paleoclimate and paleoenvironmental
    data. We present a synthetic, global-scale archaeological radiocarbon database
    composed of 180,070 radiocarbon dates that have been cleaned according to a standardized
    sample selection criteria. This database increases the reusability of archaeological
    radiocarbon data and streamlines quality control assessments for various types
    of paleo-demographic research. As part of an assessment of data quality, we conduct
    two analyses of sampling bias in the global database at multiple scales. This
    database is ideal for paleo-demographic research focused on dates-as-data, bayesian
    modeling, or summed probability distribution methodologies.}"
  :copyright: "{2022 The Author(s)}"
  :langid: "{english}"
  :keywords: "{Archaeology,Chemistry}"
  :month_numeric: "{1}"

Changelog